THE LATEST 40 QUEST REPORTS--ANY OR ALL CAN BE READ RIGHT HERE

WELCOME TO THE QUEST--THINGS ARE VERY DIFFERENT HERE

QUEST FOR THE RING USER GUIDE

THE TEAMS WHICH THE QUEST FOR THE RING IS CURRENTLY SPECIALIZING IN

THE QUEST FOR THE RING WELCOMES YOU TO THE REAL ZONE; HAVE A GOOD VISIT

DON'T FORGET TO BOOKMARK THE QUEST

QUEST REPORTS #41 TO #60, GOING BACK IN TIME

QUEST FOR THE RING OFFICIAL SONG: GYPTIAN: AFRICAN PRIZE

COMPLETE DIRECTORY OF ALL THE WAYS TO FIND AND READ REPORTS

QUEST REPORTS #61 TO #80, GOING BACK IN TIME

MISSION AND PRIMARY OBJECTIVES OF THE QUEST FOR THE RING

QUEST REPORTS #81 TO #100 GOING BACK IN TIME

COPYRIGHT 2007, 2008, 2009

COMPLETE AND CONTINUALLY UPDATED DIRECTORY OF ALL QUEST FOR THE RING REPORTS

COMPLETE QUEST FOR THE RING CONTENTS GOOGLE DIRECTORY (Click Triangles to Make Titles Appear)

WATCH AND LISTEN TO LIVE NBA GAMES, AND DOWNLOAD COMPLETED GAMES

DON'T FORGET TO BOOKMARK THE QUEST

QUEST REPORTS IN TRADITIONAL PRESENTATION FORMAT BEGIN HERE

Friday, January 16, 2009

Fifty Ways to Win on the Cheap

A 1970’s pop song by Paul Simon claimed that there must be fifty ways to leave your lover. Similarly, there must be at least fifty ways to win on the cheap (or with the extra effort, for those wearing the rose colored glasses) in basketball, if you were to count them all, right? But who would have thought that you would have a team demonstrating a large percentage of those fifty ways all in the same season? Why it’s none other than the Denver Nuggets demonstrating many of the fifty ways, and thereby showing how you turn a partial dismantling due to an economics emergency into the ultimate rose colored glasses season.

Consider the latest ways to win cheap (or with extra energy, if you have the rose specs on) in the regular season, demonstrated by the Nuggets.

With the score tied and with only a couple of seconds left in the January 13 Dallas Mavericks-Denver Nuggets game in Denver, Chauncey Billups threw his leg out while going up for a shot, which was supposed to be a no call or an offensive foul according to NBA publicly announced foul guidelines, yet Dallas was called for the foul and the Billups free throws "won" the game for Denver. It was supposed to be an overtime game.

Mark Cuban, the owner of the Mavericks, was in attendance, and he was annoyed enough to throw a little tantrum and to probably earn himself another fine from the ultra sensitive League officials, that would go along with several previous fines. As for everyday Mavericks fans, while they knew that the Mavericks had been cheated in this game, they were not really all that upset, because they are very, very pessimistic about their team’s chances this year anyway.

From the Official NBA Rules Number 12:

Fouls and Penalties, Part B, Section 1, Clause a: “A player, including even Chauncey Billups, shall not hold, push, charge into, impede the progress of an opponent by extending a hand, forearm, leg or knee or by bending the body into a posi-tion that is not normal. Contact that results in the re-routing of an opponent is a foul which must be called immediately. “


In the very next game, the January 15 Phoenix Suns-Denver Nuggets game in Denver, with the score tied and only a handful of seconds left, the Suns' Grant Hill, isolated on an out of position Dahntay Jones, made a great crossover move into the paint, and the beaten Jones intentionally put his foot way out and tripped Hill to the floor. Why wouldn't Dahntay Jones trip Grant Hill, given that in this rose colored glasses season Denver is trying to win at all costs including at the cost of breaking the rules? Phoenix wins when Grant Hill makes either one or two free throws right? Wrong. The referees failed to make the call and so Grant Hill was not given any free throws!

Remember, this is now the ultimate rose colored glasses team in the ultimate rose colored glasses season. So Denver must win, because those glasses are apparently not only rose, but they are also magic. So Denver, with even greater altitude and attitude advantages in any “5th quarter,” goes on to win in overtime.

Although Dahntay and the Nuggets were bailed out at the end, the Suns’ Matt Barnes and Amare Stoudemire, the latter being one of the top ten players in the NBA, were in severe foul trouble all night long. It’s not as if the refs were not calling fouls. The Suns ended up with 30 personal fouls called against them and the Nuggets had 28 called against them. As usual, Nene was in foul trouble for much of the night, joined in this case by J.R. Smith.

Earlier in the Phoenix game, Anthony Carter all but tackled Grant Hill to the ground on a breakaway, and was given a flagrant one foul for that little burst of extra energy.

At this rate, roughly 1/4 of Denver’s wins will be under protest and League investigation by the end of the season.

Incidentally, did you know that Grant Hill is 36 years old now? I don’t know about you, but that makes me feel kind of old.

So this year’s Nuggets have been getting regular season wins with every known and some previously unknown regular season low rent ploys, methods, strategies, and stunts. On offense they have been fast pacing, fast breaking, and fast charging the rim, so as to win a lot of style points and foul calls from the refs, who always and I do mean always call a regular season game in favor of the team that appears to be more aggressive and energetic. The refs are, unconsciously, like "Wow, look at these guys charging around like this. It may be kind of helter skelter, but you have to love the enthusiasm. Let's make sure they get more than their share of calls."

However, in the great majority of playoff games, the referees, who are in that part of the year only the most veteran, traditional, and conventional referees that the League employs, are not so easily persuaded to play favorites due to aggression and energy per se. Assuming they are not paid off, which with any luck we can, the playoff referees can be expected to be neutral under all circumstances, and to remember that there is nothing in the NBA rules regarding the more energetic and aggressive team earning some unfair calls in it’s favor. To the contrary, the idea behind the foul rules is to penalize an overly aggressive team, not to reward it. It’s just that too often the concept gets a little twisted in a little regular season game.

In parallel to their offense, on defense the Nuggets have been goal tending to beat the band, fouling like fouling is going out of style, and depending on the refs to overlook a few of their fouls. When you consider both ends of the court combined, all of a sudden the Nuggets have become one of the best regular season referee milkers in years. Amazingly, Jerry Sloan and Greg Popovich look like pikers compared with George Karl so far this year as far as taking advantage of the foul rules, the sympathies, and the missed calls of the referees.

As to how the Nuggets are approaching the game this year, you might say that the Nuggets are playing every game as if it is the playoffs, and catching opponent after opponent off guard with what for the regular season is an abnormal amount of aggressiveness and energy. Would someone who has the address please email Nuggets headquarters and remind them that the playoffs do not start until April, and that it looks kind of funny for a team to be wearing itself out and risking a lot of injuries by playing at full out intensity in January.

The Nuggets have gone from being very fast, athletic, and talented in recent years to being fast, energetic, and aggressive this year. Well, since when you lose Eduardo Najera, Marcus Camby, and Allen Iverson in a few months time and pick up far less expensive players, you have lost a whole heap of athleticism and talent, to the point where you can forget about winning with athleticism and talent any more. So you have to credit the Nuggets for being realistic and logical, anyway.

Another factor producing win after win after win is the high altitude of the Nuggets' home court. This is something I have always tried to downplay, since athletes are supposed to be so physically fit, but it is now an inescapable fact that the Nuggets are milking the high altitude of their home court as much as possible. Their lungs are used to the thinner air, whereas the lungs of their opponents are not. By the 4th quarter of games in Denver, the Nuggets are still charging around like there is no tomorrow, whereas the opponent is huffing and puffing more and more. So the Nuggets are milking the high altitude thin air advantage for every extra steal, extra fast break, and extra foul draw they can get.

Could it be that even the referees are running short of oxygen needed, for example, to observe that Grant Hill was tripped by Dahntay Jones? Who can say for sure? Maybe, ironically, there is more truth underneath this sarcasm than I thought, and the referees actually do need more oxygen in order to think straight in Denver.

Basketball media people do not know what to make of all of these Denver wins, and they are mildly annoyed by the whole thing and hoping it goes away. No one (other than dedicated Nuggets fans) wants to see this particular version of the Denver Nuggets in the Western Conference Finals. Were that to happen, the Nuggets would be demolished by the Lakers even more thoroughly than they were last year, which would make for one ridiculous West final.

But since I have been “specializing” in the Nuggets, so I have been forced to report on all of this. And I have been forced to admit that I was completely wrong in predicting that the Nuggets would win about 40 games or even fewer this season. I guess the moral of that story if you are a basketball writer is: “Always wait to see whether a team gets a player with a name like “The Bird Man” before you write them off. If a team gets a player with a name like Bird Man, refrain from making any predictions. Laugh out loud.

But could Denver keep tapping into the Fifty Ways to Win on the Cheap to win a playoff series? No, because these ways generally only work in the regular season, against a team that is not necessarily ready to match energy and aggression levels. As I have been explaining in recent articles, most all of these methods and strategies the Nuggets are choosing (and while they are choosing very wisely, they are choosing from among a limited set of options) are ultimately relatively low payoff methods and strategies when it comes to a best of seven series.

Moreover, the other team in a playoff series is not simply going to play the role of punching bag for Denver and thereby waste all of their athleticism and talent. Rather, the other team in that series will ramp up their own energy and aggressiveness so as to keep Denver's fast break and "referee points" within reason. Meanwhile, the other team will be able to draw on advantages, and often large advantages, in things such as shooting, passing, assisting, offensive rebounding, coaching, playoff experience, and probably more than even these things although these things alone are already more than enough to win the series.

The Nuggets can be as energetic, aggressive, and flashy as they want in the regular season, but for the playoffs they are lacking many basic things. They don't have enough veteran big men, and they are short at least one good rebounder. The guards and guard-forwards other than Chauncey Billups do not have anywhere near enough confidence or consistency on offense. They do not have a dependable 3-point game unless both J.R. Smith and Linas Kleiza can become dependable by April. They only have one true playmaker (Billups) although theoretically J.R. Smith and Anthony Carter might count as ½ each. (J.R. Smith has been making a lot of plays lately.)

Probably the biggest thing the Nuggets don’t have is the “take the team on the back guy”. After George Karl decided to downsize Carmelo Anthony, and after he agreed to be downsized, because he is so, well, mellow, the Nuggets, unlike most of the other playoff teams, have no “go to” player who can, if he is on fire, and if the rest of the team is dragging, by himself score enough points to make up for the ones having the off game and change a loss into a win. Carmelo Anthony is at this moment less like players such as LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Kobe Bryant, and even Tracy McGrady than ever before, thanks to Mr. Karl, who has for some perverse reason been trying to downsize Melo offensively ever since he arrived at Nuggets headquarters.

Well, now you know some ways to win in basketball if you are a less talented and less skilled team than your opponent. Be aggressive and energetic enough to get the referees looking out for your best interests! But don't be too aggressive, because obviously if the referees decide you are too aggressive they will go against you. It’s a fine line you are walking. And don’t blame me or expect this formula to work if you get to the State finals or something.

As for the Nuggets, they should enjoy the regular season as much as possible, because in a best of seven series, the other team will know all about just about everything I have discussed. They will know about everything that Denver has been doing, and they will be ready to deal with it. They will come correct, with athleticism and talent that Denver does not have. They will come and defeat the Nuggets.


BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Ultimate Game Breakdown: Players: Trailblazers 84 Pistons 83 in Portland Jan. 7 2009

REAL PLAYER RATINGS (QUALITY) FOR THIS GAME
DETROIT PISTONS QUALITY
Tayshaun Prince, SF 0.952
Antonio McDyess, PF 0.630
Kwame Brown, C 0.566
Amir Johnson, PF 0.521
Rodney Stuckey, PG 0.320
Arron Afflalo, SG 0.279
Jason Maxiell, PF 0.234
Allen Iverson, SG 0.224

PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS QUALITY
Jerryd Bayless, PG 0.744
Rudy Fernandez, SG 0.732
Steve Blake, PG 0.704
LaMarcus Aldridge, PF 0.626
Travis Outlaw, SF 0.544
Joel Przybilla, C 0.362
Nicolas Batum, SF 0.340
Sergio Rodriguez, PG 0.233
Greg Oden, C 0.100

SCALE FOR RPR (QUALITY) RATINGS FOR A SINGLE GAME
Historic Superstar for this game 1.300 and more
Superstar 1.025 1.299
Star 0.825 1.024
Very Good 0.675 0.824
Major Role Player 0.550 0.674
Role Player 0.475 0.549
Minor Role Player 0.425 0.474
Very Minor Role Player or Very Important Defender 0.350 0.424
Poor Game or Extremely Importand Defender 0.275 0.349
Very Poor Game Regardless of Defending 0.200 0.274
Disaster Game Regardless of Defending and less 0.199

****************************************************
REAL PLAYER PRODUCTION (QUANTITY) IN THIS GAME
DETROIT PISTONS QUANTITY
Tayshaun Prince, SF 41.90
Kwame Brown, C 18.10
Antonio McDyess, PF 17.65
Rodney Stuckey, PG 12.80
Allen Iverson, SG 9.85
Amir Johnson, PF 8.85
Jason Maxiell, PF 3.75
Arron Afflalo, SG 3.35

PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS QUANTITY
LaMarcus Aldridge, PF 27.55
Steve Blake, PG 23.95
Rudy Fernandez, SG 22.70
Travis Outlaw, SF 18.50
Jerryd Bayless, PG 12.65
Joel Przybilla, C 10.85
Nicolas Batum, SF 6.80
Sergio Rodriguez, PG 3.50
Greg Oden, C 1.30

SCALE FOR RPP (QUANTITY) RATINGS FOR A SINGLE GAME
FOR STARTING PLAYERS
Only Some Players Can Ever Fly This High, but Not Very Often! 40.0 and more
Massive and Memorable Game 36.0 to 39.9
Huge Game 32.0 to 35.9
Very Big Game 28.0 to 31.9
Big Game 24.0 to 27.9
Typical Average Game 20.0 to 23.9
Somewhat Below Average Game 16.0 to 19.9
Way Below Average Game 12.0 to 15.9
Bad Game 9.0 to 11.9
Really Bad Game 5.0 to 8.9
Total Disaster minus infinity to 4.9

SCALE FOR RPP (QUANTITY) RATINGS FOR A SINGLE GAME
FOR NON-STARTING PLAYERS
Only Some Non-Starters Can Ever Fly This High, but Not Very Often! 33.0 and more
Massive and Memorable Game 29.0 to 32.9
Huge Game 25.0 to 28.9
Very Big Game 21.0 to 24.9
Big Game 17.0 to 20.9
Typical Non-Starter Game 12.0 to 16.9
Below Average Even For a Non-Starter 9.0 to 11.9
Way Below Average Even For a Non-Starter or Limited Minutes 6.0 to 8.9
Bad Game Even for a Non-Starter or Very Limited Minutes 3.0 to 5.9
Disaster: Nothing Much to Report minus infinity to 1.9

THE HIGHEST QUALITY PLAYERS IN THIS GAME













DETROIT PISTONS OUTSTANDING QUALITY GAMES
SuperStar during minutes on the court: Tayshaun Prince
Very Good during minutes on the court: Antonio McDyess
Very Good during minutes on the court: Kwame Brown
Very Good during minutes on the court: Amir Johnson








PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS OUTSTANDING QUALITY GAMES
Star during minutes on the court: Jerryd Bayless
Star during minutes on the court: Rudy Fernandez
Very Good during minutes on the court: Steve Blake
Very Good during minutes on the court: LaMarcus Aldridge
Very Good during minutes on the court: Travis Outlaw

THE GREATEST POWER PERFORMERS OF THIS GAME













DETROIT PISTONS POWER PERFORMERS
Only Some Players Can Ever Fly This High, and Not Very Often: Tayshaun Prince
Big Game: Antonio McDyess








PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS POWER PERFORMERS
Very Big Game: LaMarcus Aldridge
Very Big Game: Travis Outlaw
Big Game: Steve Blake
Big Game: Rudy Fernandez

USER GUIDE FOR ULTIMATE GAME BREAKDOWN: PLAYER REPORTS (Last updated December 8 2008)

This is a "just the important facts please, and give them to me quick" type of report. I will in some cases do a very limited amount of commentary at the bottom of this type of report, but it will really be just notes for commentary that will be elsewhere in the near future.

In many cases there will be no comments at all. Most of the commentaries I do are in "Game/Team/League Reports" and in Fast Breaks".

With an Ultimate Game Breakdown-Players report, you can see very rapidly who was most responsible for the winning or the losing of the game. Then someone, including me, can easily write a separate game report which explains how things might have worked out better for a team, or why things worked out just about as well as possible, as the case may be.

Only players who played at least 7 minutes are included in these reports. Any player who plays for only one half of one quarter (6 minutes) or less is not included since he didn't play for long enough to be fairly compared with the other players.

The Real Player Ratings formula has been very carefully and accurately tweaked again and is currently as follows:

POSITIVE FACTORS
Points 1.00 (at par)
Number of 3-Pt FGs Made 1.00
Number of 2-Pt FGs Made 0.60
Number of FTs Made 0.00

Assists 1.75

Offensive Rebounds 1.15
Defensive Rebounds 1.25
Blocks 1.60
Steals 2.15

NEGATIVE FACTORS
3-Pt FGs Missed -1.00
2-Pt FGs Missed -0.85
FTs Missed -0.85

Turnovers -2.00
Personal Fouls -0.80

ACTUAL COMBINED AWARD OR PENALTY BY TYPE OF SHOT
3-Pointer Made 4.00
2-Pointer Made 2.60
Free Throw Made 1.00
3-Pointer Missed -1.00
2-Pointer Missed -0.85
Free Throw Missed -0.85

ZERO POINTS: PERCENTAGES BELOW WHICH THERE IS A NEGATIVE NET RESULT
3-Pointer 0 score % 0.200
2-Pointer 0 score % 0.246
1-Pointer 0 score % 0.459

ASSISTS VERSUS TURNOVERS ZERO POINT
Assist/Turnover Ratio That Yields 0 Net Points: 1.143

QUALITY (RPR) AND QUANTITY (RPP)
RPR game reports show for each player the RPR (Real Player Rating) which tells you how good a player did (all the good things minus all the bad things) out on the court per unit of time. The RPP (Real Player Production) report tells you how much in total (the sum of the of the good things minus the sum of the bad things) a player did out on the court, without regard to playing time.

Many and maybe most sports watchers and an unknown but probably disturbingly large number of sports managers make the mistakes of exaggerating the importance of quantity and overlooking to some extent quality. These reports allow you to expand your horizons. These reports put quantity and quality side by side, which is extremely valuable, because both are roughly equally important in explaining accurately why and how the game turned out the way it did.

Players who over many games consistently have higher RPR (quality) but lower RPP (quantity) results are in many cases not getting enough playing time. Players that over many games consistently have lower RPR (quality) but higher RPP (quantity) results are in many cases getting too much playing time.

The exceptional cases are very often going to be players who are either truly outstanding defenders or truly bad defenders. This is because the one and only thing that is not counted, because it is impossible to calculate it, is the number of shots that a player prevents from being scores. Investigation has to date revealed that, apparently, no one has even attempted, for the NBA, rough estimates of the actual value of each player's defending, in terms of number or percentage of scores prevented, or in terms of number or percentage of possessions made worthless.

Over the coming year, I am going to be working to see if it is possible to use some combination of advanced statistics that are tracked on certain internet sites as an accurate proxy for the number of shots and/or for the number of possessions ruined by a defender.

Another exception. where it is really alright when it looks like a player is playing too much, will be if a team has a point guard who has many more turnovers than the average point guard has. Because the point guard is so important, a good coach has to play his best guard who can make plays at the position for a full set of minutes every game, pretty much regardless of how many turnovers that player makes. If you take out your designated point guard due to "too many turnovers," it's most often going to be sort of like cutting your foot off because you have a bad case of athletes foot!


BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Ultimate Game Breakdown: Pistons 88 Clippers 87 in Los Angeles Jan. 4 2009

REAL PLAYER RATINGS (QUALITY) FOR THIS GAME
DETROIT PISTONS QUALITY
Antonio McDyess, PF 0.833
Kwame Brown, C 0.695
Rodney Stuckey, PG 0.656
Tayshaun Prince, SF 0.643
Allen Iverson, SG 0.602
Amir Johnson, PF 0.530
Jason Maxiell, PF 0.459
Arron Afflalo, SG 0.257

LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS QUALITY
Eric Gordon, SG 0.786
Marcus Camby, C 0.783
DeAndre Jordan, C 0.575
Steve Novak, SF 0.526
Mardy Collins, PG 0.476
Brian Skinner, PF 0.331
Al Thornton, SF 0.261

SCALE FOR RPR (QUALITY) RATINGS FOR A SINGLE GAME
Historic Superstar for this game 1.300 and more
Superstar 1.025 1.299
Star 0.825 1.024
Very Good 0.675 0.824
Major Role Player 0.550 0.674
Role Player 0.475 0.549
Minor Role Player 0.425 0.474
Very Minor Role Player or Very Important Defender 0.350 0.424
Poor Game or Extremely Importand Defender 0.275 0.349
Very Poor Game Regardless of Defending 0.200 0.274
Disaster Game Regardless of Defending and less 0.199

****************************************************
REAL PLAYER PRODUCTION (QUANTITY) IN THIS GAME
DETROIT PISTONS QUANTITY
Rodney Stuckey, PG 28.20
Tayshaun Prince, SF 26.35
Allen Iverson, SG 25.30
Antonio McDyess, PF 19.15
Kwame Brown, C 13.20
Amir Johnson, PF 12.20
Jason Maxiell, PF 7.35
Arron Afflalo, SG 6.95

LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS QUANTITY
Eric Gordon, SG 34.60
Marcus Camby, C 32.90
Mardy Collins, PG 20.00
Steve Novak, SF 15.25
Al Thornton, SF 10.45
DeAndre Jordan, C 10.35
Brian Skinner, PF 5.95

SCALE FOR RPP (QUANTITY) RATINGS FOR A SINGLE GAME
FOR STARTING PLAYERS
Only Some Players Can Ever Fly This High, but Not Very Often! 40.0 and more
Massive and Memorable Game 36.0 to 39.9
Huge Game 32.0 to 35.9
Very Big Game 28.0 to 31.9
Big Game 24.0 to 27.9
Typical Average Game 20.0 to 23.9
Somewhat Below Average Game 16.0 to 19.9
Way Below Average Game 12.0 to 15.9
Bad Game 9.0 to 11.9
Really Bad Game 5.0 to 8.9
Total Disaster minus infinity to 4.9

SCALE FOR RPP (QUANTITY) RATINGS FOR A SINGLE GAME
FOR NON-STARTING PLAYERS
Only Some Non-Starters Can Ever Fly This High, but Not Very Often! 33.0 and more
Massive and Memorable Game 29.0 to 32.9
Huge Game 25.0 to 28.9
Very Big Game 21.0 to 24.9
Big Game 17.0 to 20.9
Typical Non-Starter Game 12.0 to 16.9
Below Average Even For a Non-Starter 9.0 to 11.9
Way Below Average Even For a Non-Starter or Limited Minutes 6.0 to 8.9
Bad Game Even for a Non-Starter or Very Limited Minutes 3.0 to 5.9
Disaster: Nothing Much to Report minus infinity to 1.9

THE HIGHEST QUALITY PLAYERS IN THIS GAME













DETROIT PISTONS OUTSTANDING QUALITY GAMES
Star during minutes on the court: Antonio McDyess
Very Good during minutes on the court: Kwame Brown
Very Good during minutes on the court: Rodney Stuckey
Very Good during minutes on the court: Tayshaun Prince
Very Good during minutes on the court: Allen Iverson








LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS OUTSTANDING QUALITY GAMES
Star during minutes on the court: Marcus Camby
Star during minutes on the court: Eric Gordon

THE GREATEST POWER PERFORMERS OF THIS GAME













DETROIT PISTONS POWER PERFORMERS
Very Big Game: Rodney Stuckey
Big Game: Tayshaun Prince
Big Game: Allen Iverson
Big Game: Antonio McDyess








LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS POWER PERFORMERS
Huge Game: Eric Gordon
Huge Game: Marcus Camby
Big Game: Mardy Collins

USER GUIDE FOR ULTIMATE GAME BREAKDOWN: PLAYER REPORTS (Last updated December 8 2008)

This is a "just the important facts please, and give them to me quick" type of report. I will in some cases do a very limited amount of commentary at the bottom of this type of report, but it will really be just notes for commentary that will be elsewhere in the near future.

In many cases there will be no comments at all. Most of the commentaries I do are in "Game/Team/League Reports" and in Fast Breaks".

With an Ultimate Game Breakdown-Players report, you can see very rapidly who was most responsible for the winning or the losing of the game. Then someone, including me, can easily write a separate game report which explains how things might have worked out better for a team, or why things worked out just about as well as possible, as the case may be.

Only players who played at least 7 minutes are included in these reports. Any player who plays for only one half of one quarter (6 minutes) or less is not included since he didn't play for long enough to be fairly compared with the other players.

The Real Player Ratings formula has been very carefully and accurately tweaked again and is currently as follows:

POSITIVE FACTORS
Points 1.00 (at par)
Number of 3-Pt FGs Made 1.00
Number of 2-Pt FGs Made 0.60
Number of FTs Made 0.00

Assists 1.75

Offensive Rebounds 1.15
Defensive Rebounds 1.25
Blocks 1.60
Steals 2.15

NEGATIVE FACTORS
3-Pt FGs Missed -1.00
2-Pt FGs Missed -0.85
FTs Missed -0.85

Turnovers -2.00
Personal Fouls -0.80

ACTUAL COMBINED AWARD OR PENALTY BY TYPE OF SHOT
3-Pointer Made 4.00
2-Pointer Made 2.60
Free Throw Made 1.00
3-Pointer Missed -1.00
2-Pointer Missed -0.85
Free Throw Missed -0.85

ZERO POINTS: PERCENTAGES BELOW WHICH THERE IS A NEGATIVE NET RESULT
3-Pointer 0 score % 0.200
2-Pointer 0 score % 0.246
1-Pointer 0 score % 0.459

ASSISTS VERSUS TURNOVERS ZERO POINT
Assist/Turnover Ratio That Yields 0 Net Points: 1.143

QUALITY (RPR) AND QUANTITY (RPP)
RPR game reports show for each player the RPR (Real Player Rating) which tells you how good a player did (all the good things minus all the bad things) out on the court per unit of time. The RPP (Real Player Production) report tells you how much in total (the sum of the of the good things minus the sum of the bad things) a player did out on the court, without regard to playing time.

Many and maybe most sports watchers and an unknown but probably disturbingly large number of sports managers make the mistakes of exaggerating the importance of quantity and overlooking to some extent quality. These reports allow you to expand your horizons. These reports put quantity and quality side by side, which is extremely valuable, because both are roughly equally important in explaining accurately why and how the game turned out the way it did.

Players who over many games consistently have higher RPR (quality) but lower RPP (quantity) results are in many cases not getting enough playing time. Players that over many games consistently have lower RPR (quality) but higher RPP (quantity) results are in many cases getting too much playing time.

The exceptional cases are very often going to be players who are either truly outstanding defenders or truly bad defenders. This is because the one and only thing that is not counted, because it is impossible to calculate it, is the number of shots that a player prevents from being scores. Investigation has to date revealed that, apparently, no one has even attempted, for the NBA, rough estimates of the actual value of each player's defending, in terms of number or percentage of scores prevented, or in terms of number or percentage of possessions made worthless.

Over the coming year, I am going to be working to see if it is possible to use some combination of advanced statistics that are tracked on certain internet sites as an accurate proxy for the number of shots and/or for the number of possessions ruined by a defender.

Another exception. where it is really alright when it looks like a player is playing too much, will be if a team has a point guard who has many more turnovers than the average point guard has. Because the point guard is so important, a good coach has to play his best guard who can make plays at the position for a full set of minutes every game, pretty much regardless of how many turnovers that player makes. If you take out your designated point guard due to "too many turnovers," it's most often going to be sort of like cutting your foot off because you have a bad case of athletes foot!


BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

How a Good, Smart Coach and a Playoff-Experienced Team Will Quickly Defeat the Nuggets in the Playoffs This Spring

The Nuggets will very, very likely be defeated in their first playoff series this year, regardless of how many regular season games they win and regardless of whether they have the home court advantage or not. The theme of this article has become sort of an annual tradition, because the Nuggets have been very quickly defeated in the playoffs for five straight years and this will most likely be the sixth straight year. Every year I explain what the Nuggets would have to do to win a playoff series, and/or why what they are doing will not work in the playoffs and, sure enough, every year, they don't change anything and every year they go up in flames.

The Nuggets are the big surprise of the NBA so far this year in terms of number of wins. Up and coming sportscasters at ESPN and so forth all forecast that the Nuggets would win a lot fewer than 50 games this year after the Marcus Camby giveaway and the failure to figure out Allen Iverson. They were all wrong, as was yours truly. The Nuggets are on track to win 48-55 regular season games.

While defeating the Nuggets may not be quite as easy this year as it has been in the most recent five years, it should not be all that difficult either. I would say that, at the most, it will be a moderately difficult thing to in 4-6 games defeat the Nuggets in the playoffs this year, which, however, for any quality coach or experienced playoff team translates into easy. While coaches such as Rick Adelman (Rockets), Byron Scott (Hornets), Greg Popovich (Spurs), and Jerry Sloan (Jazz) will most likely have no difficulty at all defeating George Karl and the Nuggets this year, it is plausible that Nate McMillan (Trailblazers) or Terry Porter (Suns) will have a more difficult task in front of them.

Unlike a regular season game where defensive aggressiveness, enthusiasm, and just plain luck can win you some games, you can not, perhaps unfortunately, win a best of seven series with those elements, particularly when there is a large mismatch in the skill levels between the coaches and/or a large mismatch in the playoff experience levels of the players involved. The Nuggets may be playoff bound, but they are that with the worst playoff coaches and with very playoff-inexperienced players.

The team that defeats them will use some combination of the following methods, techniques, and approaches to sending the Nuggets home for the 2009 off season.

SPECIFICALLY HOW THE NUGGETS WILL BE DEFEATED QUICKLY IN THE PLAYOFFS
1. The Nuggets’ opponent will finally realize that this is not really Carmelo Anthony’s team anymore, if it ever was, and that Carmelo Anthony is not the player who can or will beat you in more than one or two games in a 4-6 games playoff series. Carmelo Anthony has rebounding duties now and, although in a surprise development he has a three point shot for a change, his garden variety jump shooting is nothing much to worry about anymore as a result of his agreeing to being downsized in the offense.

Yes it's true, George Karl and the Nuggets have shot themselves in the foot by telling Carmelo Anthony to "not worry about scoring" anymore. They decided that they can do without having available to them a player who can dominate scoring to one extent to another. Karl believes in what you might call the Indirect Scoring Theory of basketball, which states that a good offense in general and good scoring in particular emerges indirectly from other factors, which are thought of in this theory as more fundamental, things such as, you guessed it, aggressive man to man defending and hustling for loose balls. However, unfortunately, there isn't in real life an automatic connection between those kinds of things and the number of points scored, at least not to the extent needed to win playoff games against quality offensive teams.

The opponent will realize that Chauncey Billups and to a lesser extent Nene are the only players on the Nuggets who can possibly endanger their winning the playoff series. With the downsizing of Carmelo Anthony having made the shortage worse, the Nuggets do not have any where near enough experienced playoff warriors to pose a real threat to win a playoff series against any reasonably well managed or reasonably playoff-experienced team.

2. Billups, for all practical purposes, is the offensive Coach of the Nuggets, and arguably the Coach of the team as a whole. As such, he deserves to get a whole lot of defensive extra attention. All other Nuggets are afraid of the wrath of George Karl were they to show any real initiative with respect to being a playmaker. So once again, the opponent must and will double and hassle Billups all game every game.

3. With Nene you want to get him into foul trouble, pure and simple. What you do is simple: go at him early and often offensively. Don’t try to foul him as much as you try to get him to foul you. The Nuggets are still a high turnover team, and that includes Nene. Do not be overly concerned that Nene has such a high field goal percentage. He hardly tries any midrange jumpers, and he will turn it over often enough to keep the damage from all his point blank layups and dunks within reason.

4. The four best offensive players on the Nuggets are all relatively high turnover rate players: Carmelo Anthony, Nene, and J.R. Smith. A good opponent will make sure it goes after these players and forces as many turnovers by them as possible. Offensive fouls are a particular kind of turnover, and all three of these Nuggets have “style problems” with the refs and are therefore vulnerable to being called for offensive fouls at a higher than typical rate. In recent years, Carmelo Anthony has been hammered in the playoffs with a large number of offensive foul calls against him.

5. Generally, the coaches of the Nuggets’ opponent will most of the time correctly choose the defensive matchups that are best for them, and make the correct decision between zone and man to man defending. Meanwhile, the Nuggets’ coaching staff will be over relying on man to man defending. The Nuggets in at least two or three playoff games will have to reduce the minutes of two or more of their aggressive man to man defenders as a result of foul trouble, particularly if the Nuggets play teams such as the Spurs and the Jazz who are highly trained at drawing fouls and who are experts at “playing the referees” in general, whereas the Nuggets, being newcomers to the game of milking the referees, are mere amateurs.

6. J.R. Smith is extremely dangerous, but much more in theory than in reality, and only in the regular season most likely. In practice the Nuggets have made Smith much less dangerous than he could be. But the Nuggets’ opponent will, at the first sign that J.R. Smith may go on a tear of hitting a bunch of threes and of impressive drives to the hoop, do whatever is necessary to force him to lose his confidence, including hard fouling, double covering, going for steals and getting a couple of them off of him, and running a much larger number of offensive plays than otherwise through whoever he is covering. Good coaches know that to cool down a streaky offensive player, you can make him work harder and attempt to break down his overall confidence by beating him when he is on defense.

Good playoff coaches will be aware that as a result of Smith being considered the “black sheep” by the Nuggets personality police, that he is vulnerable to losing his confidence, and is also vulnerable to having his minutes cut way back in the playoffs by Personality Police Chief George Karl. Smith’s personality problem is not that he has a bad personality as the Nuggets falsely believe, but that he has an immature personality. But George Karl and those who blindly support him have created the impression in J.R.’s mind that there is something wrong with his personality, that he is lacking something mentally that other players have, that he should and must have.

So Mr. Karl has made the impact of Smith’s immature personality as bad as possible for the Nuggets, by refusing to start him regardless of how well he plays, by recklessly and publicly criticizing him for minor things, by leaving him in toss up games late in the 4th quarter, which is the one context that J.R.’s immature personality can harm your team, and by, amazingly, refusing to even talk off court to the young shooting guard were he to want to discuss something.

As a result of being immature to begin with, and as a result of George Karl recklessly and severely making J.R. much more vulnerable to losing his confidence in high pressure games than he already was, J.R. Smith has been largely or completely a non-factor so far in almost all playoff games. Smith’s turnover rate has continued to be high even as his offensive and defensive game has become more mature and polished overall. There is no reason to believe that Smith’s big confidence vulnerability will not continue for most playoff games this year. However, if somehow Smith is showing signs that he might break out of the box that the Nuggets have put him in, it should be easy to put him back in that box by aggressively defending, fouling, and running plays at the extremely talented but immature shooting guard.

7. More broadly, Karl is well known for having a total breakdown of communication and relations with at least one of his players, usually tactlessly and publicly, during every playoff series he has ever been in. If the player who Karl has the falling out with is not Smith, it will be someone else. So the opponent will be doing everything possible to make any developing rift between Karl and one of the Nuggets worse, so as to literally and perhaps completely remove that Nugget from the playoffs.

8. The Nuggets’ opponent will have patience on offense and will not try to run into a brick wall by trying to pick up the pace against a team that relies heavily on very aggressive and energetic defending in general, and especially on aggressive and energetic man to man defending in the paint in particular. The opponent will keep the pace measured and use plenty of the 24 second clock. This will wear out the Nuggets extremely energetic defenders as the game wears on. Stunts and shortcuts on offense will not work well against a team that uses stunts on defense.

9. Stay calm, cool, and collected; do not allow the Nuggets, anyone on the Nuggets, or the referees to get under your skin. Tune them and their crowd out completely and don’t worry about them and their rose colored glasses. Go about your business with laser like focus. Certain teams have lost a game to the Nuggets in the regular season so far due simply to losing their cool.
.
10. The opponent will make sure that their best and hottest jump shooters have plenty of playing time and that, unlike J.R. Smith and Linas Kleiza, they have plenty of confidence. The one automatic, easy way to beat the Nuggets is to simply make your jump shots, or make the free throws if the Nuggets insist on fouling you as they often do now days. The Nuggets are saying to you: "Ok, we are going to run around all over and try to confuse your offense, we are going to run at you all night, we are going to goal tend from time to time, we are going to foul over and over and over, and we are especially going to man to man defend you aggressively and well." To which your response is simply: "Fine, have fun; we'll make our passes, our assists, and our shots, and all of your extra effort and aggressiveness will not amount to a whole lot of benefit for you." I repeat for emphasis that you must not forget to make your free throws, because the Nuggets have actually won at least a couple of regular season games simply because their opponent could not make enough free throws.

11. The opponent will overweight three point shooting even more so than is ordinarily the case in the playoffs. Do not expect you can beat the Nuggets without bothering with a three point game anymore. You can’t do that anymore both because the Nuggets are more aggressively defending the paint than in recent years and because the Nuggets themselves now have a three point game for the first time in many years, although it is too early to say whether they will still have a good three point game in the playoffs.

12. The opponent will pass, pass, and pass some more, and get as many assists as they possibly can. The opponent will maintain its playmaking identity, meaning that the top two playmaking guards will be responsible for making at least 11-12 assists per game. Beating the Nuggets’ style of defending with effective playmaking is the easiest and most sure way of defeating them. The Nuggets amazing defensive enthusiasm and aggressiveness will melt in proportion to how well you beat them with effective passing and assisting.

13. The opponent will try like heck to pass especially to anyone who can slip in behind the defense baseline and get the easy layup or dunk. This will cause the Nuggets to lose some of their aggressiveness even more quickly than will passing in general. Make sure your fastest, most elusive offensive players get plenty of playing time. The Nuggets can not foul or aggressively defend who they can not keep up with.

14. The opponent will not allow the Nuggets to rack up a huge advantage in free throw shooting. The Nuggets have been winning regular season games in part by becoming one of the best teams in the League at drawing fouls. Players on the opponent will be told to defend as well as possible, but to be careful about fouling, especially in the 1st half. The only exceptions to the try to go light on the fouling rule will be Chauncey Billups, Nene, and perhaps J.R. Smith, as previously discussed. Otherwise, see if previously unknown players such as Chris Andersen and Dahntay Jones can actually put the ball in the bucket instead of being bailed out by the refs all the time.

15. The opponent will not make the mistake of losing track of players that no one ever heard of before such as Chris Andersen and Renaldo Balkman, who have been far, far better than anyone would have expected in the regular season so far. Players such as these can not defeat you as long as you don’t ignore them and lose track of them half the time. Just respect them, put decent defenders on them, and go at them offensively repeatedly, and they will be generally out of the way as a potential playoff series problem.

16. The opponent will win one or more playoff games due to good offensive rebounding. Following the loss of Marcus Camby, the Nuggets have become vulnerable to extra aggressive offensive rebounding.



BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Fast Break: The Correct Pistons Starting Lineup

My time is limited at the moment. Meanwhile, the Pistons are out there making fools of themselves losing to the Bobcats, and Coach Michael Curry is suddenly starting to appear like he is losing the battle to get the Iverson mess under control. And the Pistons now have to play again with no rest on a back to back road game at Indiana! So this is an emergency fast break post that I will be explaining in detail (very, very great detail as you regular readers know) in the coming days and weeks.

RULES FOR MAKING SURE IVERSON DOES NOT HURT YOUR TEAM
1. If you don't realize that Iverson plays both guard positions at once regardless of his designated position you will lose out.
2. If you make a summary judgment in advance that Iverson can not be an effective point guard you will lose out.
3. If you are afraid to limit Iverson's minutes or afraid to make him come off the bench if you have to do that, you will lose out.

There are other rules you need to discover and follow to reduce the damage from the Larry Brown caused Iverson combo guard mess but those three are the most important to start with.

Now here is the correct starting lineup for the Detroit Pistons:

PG Rodney Stuckey
SG Richard Hamilton
SF Tayshaun Prince
PF Amir Johnson
C Rasheed Wallace

You bring in Iverson for Hamilton at 8-9 minutes into the game. You want either Stuckey, Iverson, or even Bynum in the game at all times when Hamilton is in the game, since Hamilton can not run the point worth a damn.

If you are going to run Prince at the point, for god's sake, don't ever do it with Hamilton and AI in the game at the same time. In that scheme you have a G-F (Prince)at the point, you have a combo guard designated at SG (Iverson) who doesn't trust or feel comfortable with the designated PG, and you have another SG (Hamilton) who needs a pure PG to excel. You have created total and complete chaos and you have ruined both the offense and the defense at the same time!

In fact, the three player combination of Prince/Iverson/Hamilton is not even among the top 50 three-player combinations for the Pistons.

Generally, Prince at the point is a very bad idea except for a few plays here and there to confuse the defense.

It sounds more complicated than it is, but I admit it's kind of complicated, and, once again, I don't have time at the moment to explain further. Much more later.



BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

The Detroit Pistons Real Player Ratings: Rodney Stuckey and Tayshaun Prince are the Pistons' MVPs So Far

The Quest is proud to announce to you that the second major improvement to Real Player Ratings (RPR) in less than half a year is now fully up and running. We are now certain that RPR is the best overall rating system in existence, and that it is now roughly as good as it will ever or can ever be.

We recently developed a statistically valid way to rate the defending of players, that is, what they do to prevent scores other than rebounding, blocks, steals, and fouls, which were always included. Although the technique used had to be indirect and inexact, it validly awards the better defenders with bigger RPR bonuses. It has been validated by comparing results obtained with the defensive ratings shown on three different "advanced basketball statistics" web sites. Our results were shown to be extremely highly correlated with the results shown on the other sites.

Point Guard Rodney Stuckey is so far the most valuable Piston in the 2008-09 regular season.

DETROIT PISTONS
REAL PLAYER RATINGS
[QUALITY OF PLAYERS]
2008-09 Regular Season
As of Jan. 13, 2009

Rodney Stuckey 0.816
Allen Iverson 0.798
Amir Johnson 0.773
Rasheed Wallace 0.772
Tayshaun Prince 0.744
Antonio McDyess 0.706
Kwame Brown 0.642
Richard Hamilton 0.637
Jason Maxiell 0.548
Arron Afflalo 0.376

Perfect Player? Is there Such a Thing? 1.000 and more
Historic Super Star 0.950 and more
Super Star 0.850 0.949
A Star Player; An Extremely Good Starter 0.775 0.849
A Great Player; A Solid Starter 0.700 0.774
Major Role Player 0.650 0.699
Role Player 0.600 0.649
Minor Role Player 0.550 0.599
Very Minor Role Player 0.500 0.549
Poor Player at This Time 0.450 0.499
Very Poor Player at This Time 0.350 0.449
Extremely Poor Player at This Time / Disaster and less 0.349

Real Player Production (RPP) is the sum of all the good things minus the sum of all the bad things a player has done since the season began. There is no methodology as of yet for adjusting RPP for defending. Therefore, you should, in order to fairly evaluate the following ratings, remember that the better defenders have done more for the team relative to the lessor defenders than the ratings are showing.

DETROIT PISTONS
REAL PLAYER PRODUCTION
[QUANTITY OF PLAYERS]
2008-09 Regular Season
Through Jan. 13, 2009

Tayshaun Prince 864.50
Allen Iverson 764.10
Rodney Stuckey 660.25
Rasheed Wallace 644.45
Richard Hamilton 541.85
Jason Maxiell 301.60
Amir Johnson 286.50
Antonio McDyess 260.15
Arron Afflalo 225.20
Kwame Brown 193.10

CLICK HERE TO REVIEW THE USER GUIDE FOR REAL PLAYER RATINGS BY TEAM, last updated Jan. 13, 2009

Congratulations and respect are due to RODNEY STUCKEY who has been leading the Pistons in quality basketball so far this season.



Congratulations and respect are due to TAYSHAUN PRINCE who leads the Pistons in terms of total contributions so far this season.



OTHER PISTONS STARS OF 2008-09
ALLEN IVERSON


AMIR JOHNSON


RASHEED WALLACE


CLICK HERE TO REVIEW THE USER GUIDE FOR REAL PLAYER RATINGS BY TEAM, last updated Jan. 13, 2009



BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

CHECK OUT OTHER QUEST PAGES: REPORT DIRECTORIES / REPORT READERS PAGES